The Hardy field of $\,\Ranexp$

(Joint work with Tobias Kaiser)

The goal of this post is to describe the Hardy field $\H = \Hanexp$ of the expansion $\Ranexp$ of the real field by all restricted analytic functions and the exponential function, based on van den Dries, Macintyre and Marker’s papers on $\Ranexp$ and on LE-series.

In particular, the first paper shows that every function definable in $\Ranexp$ is piecewise given by $\Lanexplog$-terms, and the second paper suggests that the one-variable functions defined by these terms can be described inductively, starting with the set $\F$ of all one-variable functions defined by $\Lanexp$-terms.

For $$\F = \bigcup_{n \in \NN} \F_n,$$ this is done by induction on the “level $n$ of nestedness” of $\exp$ in such a term, distinguishing along the way the subsets $$\P\F = \bigcup_{n \in \NN} \P\F_n$$ of pure germs and $$\M = \bigcup_{n \in \NN} \M_n$$ of monomials: if $n=0$, we set $$\M_0 := \set{x^k:\ k \in \ZZ}$$ and $$\F_0 := \set{F\left(x^{-1}\right):\ F \text{ is a convergent Laurent series over } \RR}.$$ In this case, $\P\F_0$ is the set of all elements of $\F_0$ with zero constant term. To continue the construction, we also set $$\P\M_0:= \M_0 \cap \P\F_0 = \set{x^k:\ k \in \ZZ \text{ is nonzero}}$$ and $$\P\F_0^\infty:= \set{P\left(x\right):\ P \text{ is a polynomial over } \RR,\ P(0)=0}.$$ Note that the following hold for $n=0$:

$\F_n$ is a differential subfield of $\H$, $\M_n$ and $\P\M_n \cup \{1\}$ are multiplicative subgroups of $\H$, and both $\P\F_n \cup \{0\}$ and $\P\F_n^\infty \cup \{0\}$ are $\RR$-vector subspaces of $\H$.

Crucial to this inductive construction is the following notion:

A germ $\,f \in \H$ is large if $\lim_{t \to +\infty} f(t) = \pm\infty$, and $\,f$ is small if $\lim_{t \to +\infty} f(t) = 0$.

Note that $\,\P\F_0^\infty$ is exactly the set consisting of all $\,f \in \P\F_0$ whose support contains only large monomials.

For the inductive step of the construction, assume that $n>0$ and the sets $\M_{i}$ and $\P\M_i$, $\F_i$ and $\P\F_i$, as well as $\P\F_i^\infty$ have been defined such that $(\ast)_i$ holds, for $i \lt n$. Then we set $$\P\M_n:= \exp \circ \P\F_{n-1}^\infty$$ and $$\M_n:= \set{a \cdot b:\ a \in \M_{n-1}, b \in \P\M_n \cup \{1\}};$$ in particular, we have $\M_{n-1} \subseteq \M_n$.

Next, we let $\F_n$ be the set of all germs of the form $$F(m_1, \dots, m_k,M_1, \dots, M_l),$$ where $F \in \RR\{X_1, \dots, X_k\}[Y_1, \dots, Y_l]$, the monomials $m_1, \dots, m_k \in \M_n$ are small and the monomials $M_1, \dots, M_l \in \M_n$ are large, and where $\RR\{X_1, \dots, X_n\}$ denotes the set of convergent power series over $\RR$ in $n$ indeterminates.

It is not hard to show the following:

Proposition 1
For nonzero $f \in \F_n$, there exist a unique countable ordinal $\alpha$, unique monomials $m_\beta \in \M_n$ and unique nonzero $r_\beta \in \RR$, for $\beta \lt \alpha$, such that $\frac{m_\beta}{m_\gamma}$ is small for $\gamma \lt \beta \lt \alpha$, and such that the sum $\sum_{\beta \lt \alpha} r_\beta m_\beta$ converges absolutely to $f$ on some interval $(a,+\infty)$.

In the situation of this proposition, we call the monomials $m_\beta$ the principal monomials of $f$ and write $$\M(f):= \set{m_\beta:\ \beta \lt \alpha},$$ and we call $$\lm(f):= m_0$$ the leading monomial of $f$.

Finally, we set $$\P\F_n:= \set{f \in \F_n:\ \text{ every } m \in \M(f) \text{ belongs to } \M_n \setminus \M_{n-1}}$$ and $$\P\F_n^\infty:= \set{f \in \P\F_n:\ \text{ every } m \in \M(f) \text{ is large}}.$$

The main observations about this construction are the following:


  1. As $\RR$-vector spaces we have $\F = \oplus_{n=0}^\infty \P\F_n$.
  2. $\H = \bigcup_{k \in \NN} \F \circ \log_k$, where $\log_k$ denotes the $k$-th compositional iterate of $\log$.

(For part 2, it suffices to show that $\log \circ f \in \F \circ \log$ for $f \in \F$; to see this, write $f = rm(1+\epsilon)$ with $r \in \RR$ nonzero, $m \in \M$ and $\epsilon \in \F$ small, and note that $\log(1+\epsilon) = G(\epsilon)$, where $G(X)$ is the convergent Taylor series of $\log$ at $1$.)


  • For $f \in \F$, we define the exponential height $\eh(f)$ to be the least $n \in \NN$ such that $f \in \F_n$.
  • For general $f \in \H$, we choose the least $k \in \NN$ such that $f \in \F \circ \log_k$, and we set $$\eh(f):= \eh\left(f \circ \exp_k\right) – k,$$ where $\exp_k$ denotes the $k$-th compositional iterate of $\exp$.

The exponential height is not well behaved under composition: take $g(x) = x+\exp(-x)$ and $f(x) = \exp(x)$. Then $$\eh(f \circ g) = \eh(\exp(x) \cdot (G \circ g)) = 1 \ne 2 = \eh(f) + \eh(g),$$ where $G(X)$ is the (convergent) Taylor series of $\exp$ at $0$.

However, it does behave well in special cases:

Proposition 2
Let $f \in \F$ and $g \in \P\F^\infty$ be such that $g(\infty) = +\infty$. Then

  1. $\eh(f \circ g) = \eh(f) + \eh(g)$;
  2. if $f \in \P\F$, then $f \circ g \in \P\F$.

Other useful observations arise out of this construction (some of which are used in the proof of the Extension Theorem), and they will be mentioned in later posts as needed.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: